Comments on Annabel Hepworth and Siobhain Ryan “Call to put GST in tax summit”, 31/01/2011, http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/call-to-put-gst-in-tax-summit/story-fn59niix-1225997120225
While including GST in the tax summit this year is without doubt a perfect argument, some of the arguments here or in the Henry tax review report are just purely elementary school economics or
Showing posts with label Australia. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Australia. Show all posts
Sunday, January 30, 2011
Friday, January 28, 2011
No alarm for Australia's aged care
Comments on Mike Steketee “Problem of the ageing boomers won't go away”, 29/01/2011, http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/opinion/problem-of-the-ageing-boomers-wont-go-away/story-e6frg6zo-1225996154932
Australia should not be too alarmed by the so called population aging issue.
Australia is different from Japan and most Western European nations because of its capacity to absorb immigration.
Australia should not be too alarmed by the so called population aging issue.
Australia is different from Japan and most Western European nations because of its capacity to absorb immigration.
Gillard's sinking PM leadership
Comments on Jennifer Hewett “Gillard's smooth sell upset by a few critics”, 29/01/2011, http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/opinion/gillards-smooth-sell-upset-by-a/story-e6frg6zo-1225996389875
A very nice and can I say balanced analysis of Gillard's levy tax.
Gillard, though smart enough, has shown an unfortunate tendency to do stupid things, such as the BER school halls huge wastes under her
A very nice and can I say balanced analysis of Gillard's levy tax.
Gillard, though smart enough, has shown an unfortunate tendency to do stupid things, such as the BER school halls huge wastes under her
Thursday, January 27, 2011
More stringent constraints needed on government's wants to increase taxation
Comments on Stephen Bartholomeusz “Gillard's spinning in a straitjacket”, 28/01/2011, http://www.businessspectator.com.au/bs.nsf/Article/Julia-Gillard-floods-levy-politics-pd20110127-DH7J5?OpenDocument&src=sph&src=rot
There should be more stringent constraints on any government that does spin and hurts taxpayers.
There should be more stringent constraints on any government that wants to
There should be more stringent constraints on any government that does spin and hurts taxpayers.
There should be more stringent constraints on any government that wants to
Wednesday, January 26, 2011
Gender inequality and equality
Comments on Steve Harris “Find room at the top for women”, 27/01/2011, http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/opinion/find-room-at-the-top-for-women/story-e6frg6zo-1225995061393
This kind of mechanical approach to gender equality, that is, by "fixed targets of 40 per cent female representation on boards and senior management teams for July 2013 for all publicly funded bodies, and July 2015 for all
This kind of mechanical approach to gender equality, that is, by "fixed targets of 40 per cent female representation on boards and senior management teams for July 2013 for all publicly funded bodies, and July 2015 for all
Freer trade - why so difficult to reach international agreements?
Comments on Craig Emerson “Doha round key to continuing global prosperity”, 27/01/2011, http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/opinion/doha-round-key-to-continuing-global-prosperity/story-e6frg6zo-1225995061033
While it is a matter of faith for free trade and free market, there is always a puzzle for the fact that if free trade is such panacea to economic growth and welfare why it has always been
While it is a matter of faith for free trade and free market, there is always a puzzle for the fact that if free trade is such panacea to economic growth and welfare why it has always been
Say no to SGX taking over ASX
Comments on Maurice Newman “Say yes to Singapore merger or risk irrelevance”, 27/01/2011, http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/opinion/say-yes-to-singapore-merger-or-risk-irrelevance/story-e6frg6zo-1225995058830
It is rubbish, isn't it?
Come on! It is not a merger, is it?
Some commentator have pointed out that SGX is smaller than ASX and is less efficient that ASX. So why should the ASX be
It is rubbish, isn't it?
Come on! It is not a merger, is it?
Some commentator have pointed out that SGX is smaller than ASX and is less efficient that ASX. So why should the ASX be
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)





