Pages

Showing posts with label Australia. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Australia. Show all posts

Sunday, January 30, 2011

GST should be in this year's tax summit

with 0 comments
Comments on Annabel Hepworth and Siobhain Ryan “Call to put GST in tax summit”, 31/01/2011, http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/call-to-put-gst-in-tax-summit/story-fn59niix-1225997120225

While including GST in the tax summit this year is without doubt a perfect argument, some of the arguments here or in the Henry tax review report are just purely elementary school economics or

Friday, January 28, 2011

No alarm for Australia's aged care

with 0 comments
Comments on Mike Steketee “Problem of the ageing boomers won't go away”, 29/01/2011, http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/opinion/problem-of-the-ageing-boomers-wont-go-away/story-e6frg6zo-1225996154932

Australia should not be too alarmed by the so called population aging issue.

Australia is different from Japan and most Western European nations because of its capacity to absorb immigration.

Gillard's sinking PM leadership

with 0 comments
Comments on Jennifer Hewett “Gillard's smooth sell upset by a few critics”, 29/01/2011, http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/opinion/gillards-smooth-sell-upset-by-a/story-e6frg6zo-1225996389875

A very nice and can I say balanced analysis of Gillard's levy tax.

Gillard, though smart enough, has shown an unfortunate tendency to do stupid things, such as the BER school halls huge wastes under her

Thursday, January 27, 2011

More stringent constraints needed on government's wants to increase taxation

with 0 comments
Comments on Stephen Bartholomeusz “Gillard's spinning in a straitjacket”, 28/01/2011, http://www.businessspectator.com.au/bs.nsf/Article/Julia-Gillard-floods-levy-politics-pd20110127-DH7J5?OpenDocument&src=sph&src=rot

There should be more stringent constraints on any government that does spin and hurts taxpayers.

There should be more stringent constraints on any government that wants to

Wednesday, January 26, 2011

Gender inequality and equality

with 0 comments
Comments on Steve Harris “Find room at the top for women”, 27/01/2011, http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/opinion/find-room-at-the-top-for-women/story-e6frg6zo-1225995061393

This kind of mechanical approach to gender equality, that is, by "fixed targets of 40 per cent female representation on boards and senior management teams for July 2013 for all publicly funded bodies, and July 2015 for all

Freer trade - why so difficult to reach international agreements?

with 0 comments
Comments on Craig Emerson “Doha round key to continuing global prosperity”, 27/01/2011, http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/opinion/doha-round-key-to-continuing-global-prosperity/story-e6frg6zo-1225995061033

While it is a matter of faith for free trade and free market, there is always a puzzle for the fact that if free trade is such panacea to economic growth and welfare why it has always been

Say no to SGX taking over ASX

with 0 comments
Comments on Maurice Newman “Say yes to Singapore merger or risk irrelevance”, 27/01/2011, http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/opinion/say-yes-to-singapore-merger-or-risk-irrelevance/story-e6frg6zo-1225995058830

It is rubbish, isn't it?

Come on! It is not a merger, is it?

Some commentator have pointed out that SGX is smaller than ASX and is less efficient that ASX. So why should the ASX be

Businesses versus labour and residents' interests

with 0 comments
Comments on Judith Sloan “Regulation and red-tape compliance a huge burden on companies”, 26/01/2011, http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/regulation-and-red-tape-compliance-a-huge-burden-on-boards/story-e6frg9if-1225994486336

The debate on population growth and especially immigration has always been dominated by businesses and their lobbies, mostly at the expenses of existing

Tuesday, January 25, 2011

Albrechtsen diabolic to the education union

with 0 comments
Comments on Janet Albrechtsen “Class warriors prepare to ambush private schools”, 26/01/2011, http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/opinion/class-warriors-prepare-to-ambush-private-schools/story-e6frg6zo-1225994520017

Let me declare that I am not a union member let alone the education union, at outset.

Having declared my non-conflict of interest, now let me begin my comments.

It seems that

Swan's levy of essentials

with 0 comments
Comments on Siobhain Ryan “Flood levy in frame as Wayne Swan rules out cuts”, 26/01/2011, http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/flood-levy-in-frame-as-wayne-swan-rules-out-cuts/story-fn59niix-1225994545370

Mr Swan opportunistically says "But I don't think the Australian people would want us to respond by hacking into essential expenditure in health or education, sacking teachers or

Monday, January 24, 2011

Brown's cheap politiking

with 0 comments
Comments on ABC report “Greens want means test for flood levy”, 25/01/2011, http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2011/01/25/3121040.htm?section=justin


Mr Brown got it half right, that is, all taxpayers including corporate taxpayers should pay it should a levy is imposed.

But he is wrong to have it means tested.

The tax is already too progressive to be fair for further increasing those who pay a

Leave the decision making to people concerned!

with 0 comments
Comments on Ian Harper “Unlock home savings to fund old age”, 25/02/2011, http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/opinion/unlock-home-savings-to-fund-old-age/story-e6frg6zo-1225993848749

Is it true that "AGEING baby boomers are haunted by two questions: will I have enough money to live comfortably in retirement; and how will I pay for aged care when the time comes?"

I don't think that is in

Sunday, January 23, 2011

Lazy journalists

with 0 comments
Comments on Phillip Coorey “Gillard has time to levy and recover”, 24/01/2011, http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/politics/gillard-has-time-to-levy-and-recover-20110123-1a16v.html?posted=successful

Please don't misrepresent the public, its sentiment is not for a levy to help those flood victims, but the government uses the revenue it already has to do so.

Further, why should be an increase on

Thursday, January 20, 2011

Australian aged care and homes of aged people

with 0 comments
Comments on David Uren and Lauren Wilson “Assets-test reform for aged care”, 21/01/2011, http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/assets-test-reform-for-aged-care/comments-fn59niix-1225991995093

It is funny nowadays that the Productivity Commission is used for any inquiry, irrespective whether it has the expertise or not.

What the hell why it should have been asked to inquire into aged

Gillard's pondering a new levy

with 0 comments
Comments on ABC report “PM flags levy to pay for flood recovery”, By Alexandra Kirk, 21/01/2011, http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2011/01/21/3117858.htm?section=justin

This is how Gillard will achieve both - by a special levy.

One can guess that when she realise she cannot deliver a surplus, she will probably have another new tax to cover the budget hole to achieve her surplus.

She says the

Wednesday, January 19, 2011

Labor's deficit and arrogance

with 0 comments
Comments on Mumble Blog (Peter Brent) “Labor’s debt and deficit problem”, 20/01/2011, http://blogs.theaustralian.news.com.au/mumble/index.php/theaustralian/comments/labors_debt_and_deficit_problem/

Peter, your concluding remark is: "This government could do with a dose of arrogance."

I don't know what you meant exactly.

I would have thought that this government does not have a deficit of